Wednesday, May 13, 2026

What we lose on the healing and awakening path


Much is said these days about healing and spiritual transformation, and the deep joy, clarity, and peace that are the promised fruits of the inner journey.

Not much is mentioned, however, about the disappointment involved in waking up, and the immense deflation wired into the transformative process.

It doesn’t really sell that well.

“Making the darkness conscious,” as Jung noted, “is disagreeable and therefore not popular.”

Healing can break our hearts and shatter old dreams. It is oriented in birth and death, creativity and destruction, transcendent and descendent currents, and must by its nature dance in the full spectrum.

Not only does it involve resurrection, but the chaotic glory of the crucifixion as well.

While it is natural to have a bias for renewal and rebirth, it would appear the beloved does not share this bias as he or she (or it or they) will make equal use of the alchemical processes of dissolution and putrefactio to open us into her world – each holy arrows in her quiver.

We want to heal but we don’t want to have to feel too much. We want to feel fully alive, but not too vulnerable and tenderized. This is so understandable and so human and need not be shamed. But it doesn’t seem to always work like that, not in this star anyway, where shakiness is the portal.

At times, “getting what I want” is no longer a majestic or sensitive-enough reference point around which to organize our experience. Love is the new organizer and may have a different idea.

Relationships ending, dreams collapsing, careers recycling, the dissolving of the way it was all supposed to turn out: these yellowings of soul are not evidence of error, failure, or defeat, but of the relentlessly creative nature of love as it emerges here. One form dying so that another may come into being.

Yes, at times the burning can seem unbearable. Such is the nature of the human heart. We may burn until we are translucent, but it is by way of this burning that wholeness is revealed.




Free writing and resources, online courses, video teachings, and his yearlong Mystery School 

Tuesday, April 28, 2026

Many of us were never taught how to stay with ourselves



Most of us were never taught how to stay with ourselves.

Not in the moments when something inside begins to open. Not when the body fills with grief, or anger, or a longing that has no clear name. Not when the nervous system begins to move toward something it once had to leave.

For many of us, leaving was not a failure. It was an intelligent act of protection. There were times when staying was not safe—when what we felt could not be received, mirrored, or held, and the intensity of our experience exceeded the capacity of the world around us to meet it.

So something in us learned to turn away. To move into thought, to organize, to soothe others, to step out of the body just enough to make it through. Over time, this becomes so familiar that it feels like who we are.

But what could not be lived did not disappear. It descended—into the body, into the shadow, into the quiet inner underworld where so much of the unlived life waits.

Into the abode of Persephone—where what has been taken below is not lost, but held in another form, waiting for the conditions in which it can return. Not all at once, and not by force, but through a slow, relational turning.

The work is not to make ourselves feel more. It is to become someone who can stay—to remain in gentle contact with what is arising, just long enough for the system to discover that it does not have to leave again.

Over time, what was once overwhelming begins to unfold. Grief begins to move. Anger begins to organize. Tenderness begins to find a place to land.

And what once felt like darkness reveals itself as something else entirely—not pathology, not brokenness, but the hidden life of the soul, waiting in the underworld until it is safe enough to come home.





Monday, April 13, 2026

Catharsis is not the same as integration



Catharsis is not the same as integration.

In shadow work and deep emotional–somatic practice, these two are often conflated. But something essential depends on our ability to tell them apart—not in theory, but in the fire of immediate experience: in the belly, the breath, the heart, the throat.

As the lost orphans of psyche and soma surge, they do not long simply to be released through spiritual or psychological practice. They yearn for relationship—for that mysterious third space where they can be known, felt, heard, and understood.

There is a growing emphasis on expression—on releasing, purging, acting out what has been repressed. And while expression has its place, something essential is being misunderstood. Because expression alone does not reorganize the psyche.

You can intensify an emotion. You can amplify it. You can even build an identity around it. None of that guarantees transformation.

In fact, without a holding environment—without the capacity to stay present in the body—these expressions can become patterned. Familiar. Even addictive. The system learns, “This is what we do with this energy.” But it does not learn anything new.

This is why catharsis, on its own, often leads to repetition—the same anger, the same shame, the same cycles, just enacted more consciously or more dramatically.

Integration asks something much more subtle. Not: how do I express this? But: can I stay with this?

Can I feel this in the body without collapsing into it? Can I remain in relationship with it, without needing to discharge it immediately?

Can I become curious about what it carries, rather than organizing around its intensity?

Because what we are meeting is not just emotion. We are meeting history—adaptations that formed in moments where there was not enough support, not enough safety, not enough attunement.

And these parts do not need to be performed. They need to be met. Gently. Slowly. Over time.
This is not as exciting. It does not lend itself to spectacle. But it is what allows something new to emerge.

Where there was compulsion, there is now space. Where there was reactivity, there is now choice. Where there was enactment, there is now relationship.

This is the slow alchemical work—not rehearsing the pattern more vividly, but gently, over time, becoming free of the need to repeat it.